News

Coronavirus: How critical is the lock-down evaluated?

Coronavirus: How critical is the lock-down evaluated?



We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Where is the biggest criticism of the Corona measures?

Although a majority of the population supports measures to contain the Corona crisis, there has been criticism of the lock-down in this country too. Professor Marc Oliver Rieger from the University of Trier and Professor Mei Wang from the WHU - Otto-Beisheim-School of Management have examined what lies behind this criticism and how strong the criticism was in different countries.

Satisfaction with the Corona measures varies widely internationally. Criticism of the measures can go in both directions: "Some complain about hard interventions, others complain about inadequate measures," reports the University of Trier. In particular, the criticism of too hard cuts is often accompanied by conspiracy theories.

Worldwide survey

The research team evaluated the data from a global survey that was conducted between March 20 and April 22, 2020 with more than 100,000 participants. On the basis of the data, Prof. Wang and Prof. Rieger tried to determine the public's perception of government measures. A corresponding evaluation was carried out for 57 countries.

Very high satisfaction in Vietnam, Qatar and New Zealand

There are significant differences in the criticism in the individual countries, with great discontent in Thailand, Venezuela and Russia, for example, while people in Vietnam, Qatar and New Zealand, for example, are very satisfied, according to the Trier University. Germany ranks in the upper midfield in this ranking.

Well-dosed measures decisive

According to the researchers, there is a high level of satisfaction, particularly where government measures are "well-metered - not too strong and not too weak." However, depending on the point of view, this criticism often turns out to be a different yardstick used for evaluation.

What does the criticism refer to?

Those who perceived the measures to be too lax have mostly relied on facts, particularly the number of deaths. In the criticism from the other direction, however, these points were given little importance. Rather, personal characteristics played a role in whether government measures were critically evaluated or not, reports the research team. For example, as education grows, people become less likely to perceive the government's response as too strong.

Relation to conspiracy theories?

Furthermore, the researchers found in a separate survey that the perception of government measures is also linked to belief in conspiracy theories. For example, among those who find the measures in Germany too strong, two thirds have shown a tendency towards conspiracy theories, while those who did not find the measures too strong had less than a quarter tendencies towards conspiracy theories.

"Of course, not every critic should be put in the drawer of" conspiracy theorists ". However, our study shows that the majority of critics of excessive restrictions have a tendency towards conspiracy theories, ”emphasize Marc Oliver Rieger and Mei Wang in the press release from the University of Trier. (fp)

Author and source information

This text corresponds to the requirements of the medical literature, medical guidelines and current studies and has been checked by medical doctors.

Dipl. Geogr. Fabian Peters

Swell:

  • Universität Trier: What is the criticism of the lock-down? (published May 25, 2020), uni-trier.de



Video: Italy on lockdown over coronavirus l ABC News (August 2022).